Should The First Amendment Be Amended?

By Lorana Hoopes

Texas A&M canceled a white supremacist rally planned for September 11th after the tragedy in Charlottesville. Not only do I applaud them, but I think we ought to be doing more of this.

First of all, any event planned on 9/11 always gives me a foreboding feeling. Couple that with it being a Nazi rally and that is a recipe for disaster. Why do we allow these groups of hate to protest anyway?

Oh I know, it’s because the first amendment gives us freedom of speech, but I don’t think hate rallies that called for exterminating entire races was ever in the forefather’s minds when they wrote the first amendment. In fact, I’d like to think the context behind the amendment was to protect journalists and others who might get sued for reporting the truth. I’m not saying hate speech didn’t exist then, but certainly, not in the dangerous scope, it exists now with the internet.

We have seen how the internet has increased violence partly because it allows anonymity and partly because it allows people to gather quickly. Before the internet, the chances of loud protesting crowds gathering was much smaller because people didn’t know about it and they would have had to travel much farther. And unfortunately, when you get groups together, violence is always a bigger possibility. When you try to have opposing groups meet a protesting group, the percentage of violence escalates. Why?

Because group mentality is a different beast altogether. All too often, people do things in a group they would never do alone because they feel safer, they feel pressure to do it. Plus, the group mentality raises emotions and makes reactions more volatile. If someone says something hurtful to you one on one, you have the option to walk away, but when you are facing a group of angry people screaming at you, it gets much harder to turn a cheek.

It saddens me that hateful people hide behind the first amendment. The first amendment should not be a cart blanch ticket to call for the extermination of a race. It should not be a pass to be able to declare one race more important than the other based on a pigment in their skin. It should not be a shield for people to spew closed-minded and deadly ideas. This is how the Holocaust started. One man sharing ignorant and wrong ideas to large crowds who were desperate for change.

Perhaps it’s time to amend the first amendment to stop protecting these hate groups and dangerous rallies.

Lorana Hoopes is an author of children’s books and clean inspirational romance novels.Her books are available at Amazon.Heartbeats series Wishing stone series Star Lake series

Sign up for her newsletter to receive a free sneak peek of her next series and a chance to win a monthly gift card. Pre-order your copy of A Father’s Love for just .99 until 9/15/17

I'm an Author, actor, kickboxer, mother of three, military wife, Christian.


  1. Although I agree with your sentiment, it creates a slippery slope whereon abuse can be reaped later.

    1. Especially when you have a president that already considers anything that he doesn’t like “fake news” or “lies”. He’d be clapping giddily at calling anything that criticizes him “hate speech” and arresting people for it.

Share Your Thoughts?